End GOP Chalkblocking!

What is chalkblocking, you ask?  Well, Rachel Maddow on Friday called for ideas for new terminology to replace the stiflingly boring “filibuster”.  She has billed it as an effort to reinvigorate the somnambulant national conversation over the Senate’s inability to pass legislation:

February 13th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Category: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

R.I.P. GOP: First Benchmark

The fate of the GOP now rests securely in President Obama's hands.

The fate of the GOP now rests securely in President Obama's hands.

With Al Franken finally being certified as the winner in Minnesota’s 2008 senatorial race, we have suddenly arrived at the first test of my theory concerning Nate Silver’s Republican Death Spiral.  Franken’s arrival gives the Democrats a 60-seat majority in the Senate.  No one should get terribly excited about this, both for the reasons outlined in virtually every major news outlet as well as the fact that 60 shouldn’t be the big number we make it.  Virtually all of Obama’s agenda now depends on how well he can hold together his party’s much-expanded coalition.

A Tipping Point

In my initial post on this topic, one of the major determinants was how quickly internal bickering began to actually cause a rift in the Democratic Party.  With steady, competent leadership, the Democrats may hold their coalition together long enough for the Republicans to bleed out.  However, if the bickering becomes damaging very quickly, and voters believe the party to be ineffectual, those who recently left the Republican Party may run back.  If the Democratic coalition holds out longer, the Republicans may have hemorrhaged too many voters to recover.  If, for instance, the Libertarian Party manages to gain parity with their Republican cousins, then that party, and not the GOP could be the beneficiary of a Democratic split. Continue reading…

Conventional Wisdom: 60 Votes

Anyone who paid attention in high school civics class knows it takes a majority to pass a bill.  In the Senate, that means 51.  In today’s world, though, the operative number is 60.  60 represents the mythical supermajority, the three-fifths of the Senate needed to break a filibuster, but has become the de facto definition of a majority:

  • The New York Times:

Republicans such as Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine and Chuck Grassley of Iowa have supported other forms of an RES voted by the Senate in 2005 and 2007. However, the RES in 2005 only had a target of 10 percent by 2020 and the 2007 provision — 15 percent by 2020 — was lumped together with an objectionable energy tax provision, both of which were stripped of the energy bill in order to pass. The bill with the RES title and tax provisions originally failed to reach the 60-vote threshold by a vote of 53-42.

Continue reading…