Poking the [Insert Favorite Predatory Animal Metaphor Here]

That hat is very fitting.

That hat doesn't make you look like an idiot. It just accentuates it. Brings out the stupid in your eyes.

Joe Lieberman has announced that, while he will vote for the Senate’s health reform bill to be brought up for debate, he will not vote in favor of cloture to end debate and bring the bill to a vote.  As always happens with Mr. Lieberman, I am surprised but I shouldn’t be.  To Mr. Lieberman I say: Go with God.  Please.  Now.  I dare you.

Joe Lieberman is about to enter the pantheon of ‘firsts’: First senator to break with his caucus and vote against cloture to end a filibuster.  Arlin Specter has been a Democrat for a little more than six months (this time around) and he wasn’t even on anyone’s list of possible challenges.  No, that decision requires a certain kind of tone-deafness and egotism that few, even in the esteemed halls of the United States Senate, could ever hope to achieve.  Especially when the issue in question is the very health and quality of life of your own constituents.

Connecticut may be ranked sixth in the nation in health care quality, (as of 2007) but 64% of those Connecticut voters polled are in favor of a public option, so Lieberman’s opposition to his own caucus is not based on the wishes of his constituents.  Is he considering the interests of his constituents?  He certainly claims to be (according to Politico):

To put this government-created insurance company on top of everything else is just asking for trouble for the taxpayers, for the premium payers and for the national debt. I don’t think we need it now.

Continue reading…

President Obama: Connect, Don’t Lecture

An open letter to the President of the United States

Mr. President:

You are being advised badly.  There is no longer any getting around that.  The evidence for this is legion, but the most glaring one today is your speech on health care, to be given before a joint session of Congress.  From [...]

Conventional Wisdom: 60 Votes

Anyone who paid attention in high school civics class knows it takes a majority to pass a bill.  In the Senate, that means 51.  In today’s world, though, the operative number is 60.  60 represents the mythical supermajority, the three-fifths of the Senate needed to break a filibuster, but has become the de facto definition of a majority:

  • The New York Times:

Republicans such as Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine and Chuck Grassley of Iowa have supported other forms of an RES voted by the Senate in 2005 and 2007. However, the RES in 2005 only had a target of 10 percent by 2020 and the 2007 provision — 15 percent by 2020 — was lumped together with an objectionable energy tax provision, both of which were stripped of the energy bill in order to pass. The bill with the RES title and tax provisions originally failed to reach the 60-vote threshold by a vote of 53-42.

Continue reading…